Dean Patrick Kyamanywa strode to the front of the room, sat
down on a stool, and peered out at his audience through his spectacles. Forty
of us had collected at Open Grounds, a study and meeting space in the Corner
building at the University of Virginia. The décor, heavy on granite, metal, and
flat screens, was contemporary, perhaps even futurist. Images from Rwanda, land
of a thousand hills, were projected all over the room. I felt like I was at a
TED talk.
Dean Patrick is the Dean of Medicine at the National
University of Rwanda. Over the past few years, there has been significant
cross-talk between UVA and the National University of Rwanda. Several of my
colleagues in the School of Medicine have had the opportunity to travel to
Rwanda and learn about challenges in surgery and medical education outside
America. All of them have come back raving about their time in Rwanda and most
of them began seeking ways to return almost as soon as they came back!
Given the sci-fi feel of Open Grounds, I had expected a cool
powerpoint presentation. Instead, Dean Patrick dazzled us all by speaking extemporaneously,
only consulting his notes occasionally to ensure accuracy in his figures and
quotations. His talk touched on several important issues. Most notably, he
discussed the need for countries providing aid (whom he dubbed “The global
North”) to seek input from the countries receiving aid (the “The global South”)
regarding issues that need to be addressed in their country instead of being
overtly prescriptive. Dean Patrick discussed several other aspects of
international partnerships in the world of global health, noting how much
Northern and Southern partners had to offer each other. He also made a
compelling case for horizontal transfers of information: they allow for
organizational independence in joint ventures as well as an efficient
horizontal transfer of insight, and technology between southern partners.
I believe one marker of good speakers is that they leave you
with more questions than answers. Dean Patrick did so by explicitly stating
several questions for us to mull over during the discussion. One of his
questions set me thinking: students who visit Rwanda gain immensely from the
experience, but what do they give back?
Several of the students in the audience had been recipients
of scholarships that enabled us to travel abroad for research or mission trips.
Personally, I had received three thousand dollars to conduct a small study in
India. While there, I also had the opportunity to meet hundreds of my
countrymen through weekly community health screenings. No book, no documentary,
no public health class could have communicated to me the severity of health
disparities in rural India or the enormity of the task before us like that
summer’s work in India .
But was that really the best use of that money? What had I
given back to India?
One of my most enduring memories from India is of an
emaciated young boy who came up to me during a community health screening. He
was thirteen years old, but looked like he was nine; his mother informed me
that he had a weak heart. Slightly incredulous, I placed my shiny new
stethoscope on his chest . “Lub-swoosh-dup….Lub-swoosh-dup….Lub-swoosh-dup...”
went his ticker. There was no mistaking it: he had severe mitral regurgitation.
I felt quite clever about my physical exam skills, but became quickly
disenchanted when I realized that all I had done was label the child as a heart
patient. After all, a valve replacement surgery costs at least half of his
family’s earnings for an entire year! In all likelihood, the family would have
to look on helplessly as his heart struggled with its leaky valve.
What good was my label to him?
Three thousand dollars could have paid for the surgeries of
at least six children like him. Three thousand dollars may even have bought an
ultrasound machine that cardiologists could use to monitor his condition. Three
thousand dollars would easily pay for vaccination, vitamin supplementation, and
deworming programs for him and all his classmates.
I blurted out a brief description of my time in India and
asked the following question: “Transformative as the trip was for me, would the
money have been better spent in more direct ways?”
Dean Patrick thought for a few seconds as he mulled over my
question. To my relief, he smiled and then offered several arguments for why it
was important to spend those three thousand dollars to provide me that
experience. He argued that I had returned to UVA with a more sophisticated
understanding of global health and with a fortified commitment to working on
global health issues. Thus, he felt it was important to invest in a future
generation of intellectuals from different fields who would grow to care about
issues in the developing world based on their experiences during international
research or mission trips. Hearing Dean Patrick’s answer
made me feel grateful for the opportunities I had been
given and reinforced what what is expected of me in the
future. I am sure the other CGH scholars in the room felt the same way. I think everyone leaving the talk did so with their brain buzzing a touch more than usual.
Personally, I left thinking about how I would make those three thousand dollars count.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Personally, I left thinking about how I would make those three thousand dollars count.
_________________________________________________________________________________
If you would also like to experience the challenges, joys,
disappointments, and triumphs of research or service projects relevant to
global health, do consider applying for a Center for Global Health scholarship.
You can find out more at http://globalhealth.virginia.edu/.
Information for the 2014 CGH Scholars Application Process will be available in
the fall 2013. In the meantime, please
contact the Center with questions at 434.243.6383 or
ctrglobalhealth@virginia.edu.
No comments:
Post a Comment